A voice of one crying out in the desert:"Prepare the way of the Lord."
Lk 3:1-6
WILLIAM BARCLAY
To Luke the emergence of John the Baptist
was one of the hinges on which history turned. So much so is that the case that
he dates it in no fewer than six different ways.
- Tiberius was the successor of Augustus and therefore the second of the Roman emperors. As early as A.D. 11 or 12 Augustus had made him his colleague in the imperial power but did not become sole emperor until A.D. 14. The fifteenth year of his reign would therefore be A.D. 28-29. Luke begins by setting the emergence of John against a world background, the ground of the Roman Empire.
The next three dates Luke gives are
connected with the political organization of Palestine. The title tetrarch
literally means governor of a fourth part. In such provinces as Thessaly and Galatia,
which were divided into four sections or areas, the governor of each part was
known as a tetrarch: but later the word widened its meaning and came to mean
the governor of any part. Herod the Great died in 4 B.C. after the reign of
about forty years. He divided his kingdom between three of his sons and in the
first instance the Romans approved the decision.
- (a) To Herod Antipas were left Galilee and Peraea. He reigned from 4 B.C. to A.D. 39 and therefore Jesus' life was lived in Herod's reign and very largely in Herod's dominions in Galilee.
- (b) To Herod Philip were left Ituraea and Trachonitis. He reigned from 4 B.C. to A.D. 33. Caesarea Philippi was called after him and was actually built by him.
- (c) To Archelaus were left Judaea, Samaria and Edom. He was a thoroughly bad king. The Jews in the end actually petitioned Rome for his removal; and Rome, impatient of the continual troubles in Judaea, installed a procurator or governor. That is how the Romans came directly to rule Judaea. At this time Pilate, who was in power from A.D. 25 until A.D. 37, was Roman governor. So in this one sentence Luke gives us a panoramic view of the division of the kingdom which had once belonged to Herod the Great.
Of Lysanias we know practically nothing.
Having dealt with the world situation and
the Palestinian political situation, Luke turns to the religious situation and dates
John's emergence as being in the priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas.
There never
at any time were two high-priests at one time. What then does Luke mean by giving
these two names. The high-priest was at one and the same time the civil and the
religious head of the community. In the old days office of high-priest had been
hereditary and for life. But with the coming of the Romans rule the office was
the object of all kinds of intrigue. The result was that between 37 B.C. and
A.D. 26 there were no fewer than twenty-eight different high-priests.
Now Annas
was actually high-priest from A.D. 7 until A.D. 14. He was therefore at this
time out of office; but he was succeeded by no fewer than four of his sons. And
Caiaphas was his son-in-law. Therefore, although Caiaphas was the reigning
high-priest, Annas was the power behind the throne. That is in fact why Jesus
was brought first to hirn after his arrest (John 18: 13), although at that time
he was not in office. Luke associates his name with Caiaphas because, although
Caiaphas was the actual high-priest, Annas was still the most influential
priestly figure in the land.
Verses 4-6 are a quotation from Isaiah 40: 3-5.
When a king proposed to tour a part of his dominions in the east, he sent
a courier before him to tell the people to prepare the roads. So John is
regarded as the courier of the King. But the preparation on which he insisted
was a preparation of heart and of life. “The King is coming,” he said , “Mend
not your roads, but your lives.” There is laid on everyone of us the duty to
make his life fit for the King to see.
1 comment:
Great article! We will be linking to this great content on our site.
Keep up the great writing.
My blog post free teen porn
Post a Comment