Friday, September 24, 2010

26TH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME (C)

Abraham replied, 'My child, remember that you received what was good during your lifetime while Lazarus likewise received what was bad; but now he is comforted here, whereas you are tormented."
Lk 16: 19-31

The first reading from Amos and the Gospel share a common concern. Amos declares that lack of concern for others will not go unpunished by God. Luke states that an element of Christian discipleship is care for the poor and the outcasts.

The rich man remained unnamed. (Preachers though have named him “Dives” which is the Latin for “rich”). On the other hand, the poor man was given a name in the story, Lazarus. (He is not to be confused with Lazarus in John’s Gospel. In that gospel, he is certainly not poor. He also has two sisters, Martha and Mary, who would have surely taken care of him.) This shows reversal of values. The poor is given more importance than the rich.

Giving importance to the poor is a favorite them of St. Luke’s gospel. We find this in the Beatitudes and in the Canticle of Mary.

"Blessed are you who are poor, for the kingdom of God is yours. Blessed are you who are now hungry, for you will be satisfied. Blessed are you who are now weeping, for you will laugh” (Lk 6:20-21).

He has thrown down the rulers from their thrones but lifted up the lowly. The hungry he has filled with good things; the rich he has sent away empty” (Lk 1:52-53).

Does God love the poor because they are poor? Yes. And it is, I think, in this sense. Cardinal Sin used to say that he was his mother’s favorite because he was the ugliest child. (In reality, it was because he was a sickly child.) In the same way God loves the poor in the sense that it is they who need more attention than the rich.
Does this mean that God wants us to be poor? Of course not. Mother’s don’t want any of her children to be ugly or sickly.

Take note that the rich man was condemned to Hades not because he did anything bad to Lazarus. In fact, he did nothing to Lazarus. His was the sin of omission. He failed to do anything to alleviate the hardship of Lazarus. The rich man lacked compassion. Lazarus was just outside his home, at the door of his house. But he closes his eyes and his heart to him.

The Christian way is to use one’s money not only for oneself and also for others.

There is a place in Mabini, Batangas called “Little Italy”. You can easily set apart this barangay because of its beautiful houses. They belong to OFW’s who work in Italy. These OFW’s, however, do not only send money to build their houses but also for the construction of public buildings, like classrooms.

It is not unusual for an aunt or uncle who have to work to earn a living to sponsor the studies of a nephew or a niece.
Knowing how expensive it is to bury the dead, neighbors and friends willingly give their “abuloy” to help defray the expenses.
Sometimes, it is not a question of money. When I was small, a very strong ty-phoon struck Metro Manila. Our neighbor’s roof was made of nipa. It was easily blown away like a piece of paper. My mother welcomed them into our house and gave them a change of clothing.

A statement of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines is worth remembering: “No one is so poor as to be incapable of giving anything and no one is so rich as to be in need of nothing.”

While generosity is to be appreciated and promoted, it is also important not to create an attitude of perpetual dependence. The barangay captain of Little Italy laments the fact that since the OFW’s send money every month without fail, the people there have become lazy. They have found no reason to work anymore.

For this reason, GK does not just dole out houses to the poor. GK demands community participation. It requires the members of the community to do the work of building the houses that they will live in.

Friday, September 17, 2010

25TH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME (C)


You cannot serve God and mammon.
Lk 16:1-13

The situation

The master or owner lived elsewhere. He had a steward or administrator who can enter into agreement on behalf of his master (power or attorney?).

Charging of interest was forbidden by the OT. In order to skirt this prohibi-tion, only the sum of the principal and the interest appeared in the document (a sort of I.O.U.).

vv. 1-2. A rich man had a steward who was reported to him for squandering his property. He summoned him and said, 'What is this I hear about you? Prepare a full account of your stewardship, because you can no longer be my steward.'

The steward was accused of squandering the property of the master, not of any dishonesty.

The Greek word for “reported” meant “accusing someone with hostile in-tent”. The steward could have been innocent but the master believed the report.

vv. 3-4. The steward said to himself, 'What shall I do, now that my master is taking the position of steward away from me? I am not strong enough to dig and I am ashamed to beg. I know what I shall do so that, when I am removed from the stewardship, they may welcome me into their homes.'

The steward did not waste time engaging in self-pity. He studied the situation and took decisive action.

vv. 5-7. He called in his master's debtors one by one. To the first he said, 'How much do you owe my master?' He replied, 'One hundred measures of olive oil.' He said to him, 'Here is your promissory note. Sit down and quickly write one for fifty.' Then to another he said, 'And you, how much do you owe?' He replied, 'One hundred kors of wheat.' He said to him, 'Here is your promissory note; write one for eighty.'

The steward re-wrote the I.O.U.’s of the debtors. He removed the interest and left only the principal.
In today’s terms, the oil owed was somewhere between 210 and 450 liters. It was reduced to somewhere between 105 to 225 liters.

The grains owed (using volume and not weight) was somewhere between 21,000 to 45,000 liters. It was reduced to somewhere between 10,500 to 22,500 liters.

The amount owed show that the debtors were probably merchants and not tenants.

v. 8. And the master commended that dishonest steward for acting prudently. "For the children of this world are more prudent in dealing with their own generation than are the children of light.

The master here is the rich man. He praises the steward for his prudence. Here prudence is to be understood as practical action toward a particular end and does not necessarily refer to virtue.

v. 9. I tell you, make friends for yourselves with dishonest wealth, so that when it fails, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings.

We are told by Jesus that we (the children of light) must be at least as clever and enthusiastic about the things of heaven as the children of this world are about the things of earth.

The Greek words translated here and in verse 11 as "dishonest wealth" is lit-erally, "mammon of iniquity." Mammon is the Greek transliteration of a Hebrew or Aramaic word that is usually explained as meaning "that in which one trusts."

vv. 10-12. The person who is trustworthy in very small matters is also trustwor-thy in great ones; and the person who is dishonest in very small matters is also dishonest in great ones. If, therefore, you are not trustworthy with dishonest wealth, who will trust you with true wealth? If you are not trustworthy with what belongs to another, who will give you what is yours?

Jesus urges constant fidelity as an absolute requirement for those in positions of responsibility.

v. 13. No servant can serve two masters. 8 He will either hate one and love the other, or be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon."

Dependence on wealth is opposed to the teachings of Jesus who insists on complete dependence on the Father as an important characteristic of the Christian disciple (Luke 12:22-39). A disciple must give complete and exclusive loyalty to God or he runs the risk of being enslaved by mammon. One shows this loyalty to God by sharing mammon (wealth) with others.